![]() The organization will implement the declarativeNetRequest API for compatibility reasons according to the blog Gorhill hasn’t even started to develop manifestv3 uBlock, so what can he show about it? If you care about what he says like if he was the only person affected by this, then read but since he hasn’t started working on it, it is all speculation on his part, of course he has some important observations about some stuff, so it is good to read.īut did you even try to stop being so obtuse and find other developers like Adguard team, who have already posted information about manifestv3, have been working on it and also know about it since it’s what their business is about? Mozilla will keep the WebRequest API in Firefox to make sure that privacy extensions are not limited in providing the functionality they are designed for. Mozilla notes that the new API limits "capabilities of certain types of privacy extensions without adequate replacement". The decision to remove the blocking part of the WebRequest API and to replace it with the limiting declarativeNetRequest API was at the center of the controversy. A new blog post on the Mozilla Add-ons Community blog sheds light on the adoption and the differences between Mozilla's and Google's implementation. Mozilla announced in 2019 that it would implement support for Manifest V3 in Firefox but would make adjustments to certain limitations. Firefox extensions won't be limited by Manifest V3 The company landed Manifest V3 support in Chrome Canary 80 and in Chrome Beta 88. ![]() Google made some concessions to developers but continued its work on introducing the new capabilities and removing the old. Developers voiced concern over some of the planned changes, as they would limit privacy-focused extensions such as content blockers from working properly. The initial version of the draft was discussed controversially.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |